Feedback Form

History Immunoaugmentative Therapy (IAT)

 
Natural Standard Research Collaboration
Monday, 04 August 2008
 
History Immunoaugmentative Therapy (IAT)
Uses Immunoaugmentative Therapy (IAT)
Safety Immunoaugmentative Therapy (IAT)
Alternative and Integrative Therapies for Immunoaugmentative Therapy (IAT)
 

1950s: A zoologist named Lawrence Burton developed the theory of immunoaugmentative therapy (IAT) in the 1950s. Burton claimed that IAT caused cancer to go into remission in mice. However, the results of his studies were questioned and other scientists were unable to produce the same results.

1973: Burton established the Immunology Research Foundation in New York and began offering IAT to cancer patients in 1973.

1974: In 1974, Burton submitted an investigation new drug (IND) application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to start human trials with IAT. However, he withdrew his application after the FDA asked for his experimental evidence.

1977: In 1977, Burton closed the New York clinic and opened the Immunology Researching Centre (IRC) in the Bahamas.

1978: In 1978,representatives of the Bahamian Ministry of Health and the Pan American Health Organization visited Burton's clinic and reviewed the medical charts of several patients. The health officials concluded that there was no evidence that IAT was a beneficial treatment for cancer patients. The clinic remained open even though the health officials recommended that it be shut down.

Late 1970s/early 1980s: During the late 1970s and early 1980s, officials from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the United States asked to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of IAT. However, an agreement could not be made between Burton and the NCI. Burton never explained his technique for isolating the blood proteins, which he had patented.

1985: In 1985, Bahamian health authorities closed Burton's clinic because several of his patients developed serious infections, including hepatitis B and HIV. Health officials suspected that the infections were the result of contaminated blood used during IAT. However, the clinic re–opened in less than one year.

1986: The FDA banned the import of IAT drugs in 1986 because the agency was concerned that the products were contaminated with infectious diseases, including hepatitis B and HIV.

The U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) worked with Burton to develop procedures for a study of IAT in colon cancer patients. However, the research did not produce any reliable data on the effectiveness of IAT.

2003: In April 2003, the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) issued a report on IAT. Using criteria developed by the NCI, the agency evaluated nine cancer patients that were treated with IAT. The patients had different type of cancers, which included Hodgkin's lymphoma, non–small cell carcinoma of the lung, nodular lymphoma, peritoneal mesothelioma, ovarian adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the vocal cords, and adenocarcinoma of the colon. The agency could not come to a clear conclusion about the effectiveness of IAT. The agency recommended further studies.

2007: There is currently no evidence on the safety or effectiveness of IAT. Proponents of IAT claim that the therapy can reduce or stop the spread of many cancers. Proponents also believe that IAT may increase life expectancy and quality of life in cancer patients.

Hits: 26
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
  Ask a Question
 
 
Enter question title here
(110 characters max)